History
  • No items yet
midpage
368 U.S. 18
U.S.
1961
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Case Details

Case Name: Tinsley v. City of Richmond
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 23, 1961
Citations: 368 U.S. 18; 1961 U.S. LEXIS 293; 7 L. Ed. 2d 86; 82 S. Ct. 137; 315
Docket Number: 315
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Tinsley v. City of Richmond, 368 U.S. 18