History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tinkom v. Purdy
5 Johns. 345
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1810
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The adjournment of the sale to a different place, was a matter of discretion with the constable ; and the question must always be, whether this discretion has been abused. These is no charge of fraud or abuse in the present case ; and the constable could not, therefore, be liable as a trespasser. The judgment below must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Tinkom v. Purdy
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 1810
Citation: 5 Johns. 345
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.