Tims v. Folsom, 535 So. 2d 301

PER CURIAM.

We find the circumstances of this case appear to be controlled by the rule pronounced by this court in Mayo v. Dugger, 535 So.2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), On Motion for Rehearing and Clarification. Accordingly, the order denying appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is reversed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Tims v. Folsom

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Dec 14, 1988

Citations: 535 So. 2d 301; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2737; 1988 WL 134440; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5542; No. 88-67

Docket Number: No. 88-67

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.