midpage

Tim v. StateTim v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 8, 1989
No. 87-00250
Versions:553 So. 2d 370
14 Fla. L. Weekly 2834
1989 WL 147940
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6850
PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to our prior decision in Sotolongo v. State, 530 So.2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), in which we reversed the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence filed by appellant’s codefendant, and because the facts in both cases are indistinguishable, the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence is reversed. We reject the state’s argument that the “good faith” exception to the warrant requirement enunciated in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), should apply.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Tim v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 8, 1989
Citations: 553 So. 2d 370; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2834; 1989 WL 147940; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6850; No. 87-00250
Docket Number: No. 87-00250
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In