History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tillman v. State
559 So. 2d 754
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1990
Check Treatment

ON PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellee’s petition for clarification and substitute the following opinion.

We affirm without discussion the defendant’s conviction for attempted sexual battery. We reverse the conviction as to the charge of sexual battery. The state’s information charged the defendant with “penetration” but not “union with” under section 794.011(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1987), however, the state’s evidence at trial did not prove penetration occurred. In light of the sufficient record evidence that an attempted sexual battery occurred, we remand this matter, as we recently did in Firkey v. State, 557 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), with directions to the trial court to enter judgment for attempted sexual battery and resentence appellant accordingly.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Tillman v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 2, 1990
Citation: 559 So. 2d 754
Docket Number: No. 88-2880
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.