37 A. 344 | R.I. | 1897
This bill seeks to restrain the defendant from violating the terms of his agreement by which he was employed to work for the complainant, as a dentist, with a stipulation that he would not, after the termination of the contract, "either directly or indirectly carry on or be employed or concerned in the practice of dentistry in the county of Providence, Rhode Island."
The ground urged upon demurrer to the bill is that the restrictions are unreasonable. It was decided in French v.Parker,
The demurrer is overruled.