History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tilley v. Cobb
56 Minn. 295
Minn.
1894
Check Treatment
Collins, J.

The District Court in which this action was brought had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties. Its right and power, as wTell as its duty, to proceed to a trial after the Federal Court had refused to entertain the case, and had remanded it, ought not to be challenged. The ruling of the latter when remanding cannot be reviewed in the state courts. Judgment affirmed.

Canty, J, having tried the case as a District Judge, took no part»

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 799.)

Case Details

Case Name: Tilley v. Cobb
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jan 25, 1894
Citation: 56 Minn. 295
Docket Number: No. 8400
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.