Tiger v. Drumright
267 U.S. 578
SCOTUS
1925
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.'

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as *579amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6.

Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for plaintiff, in error. Mr. Malcolm E. Rosser for defendants in error, submitted.