History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tierney v. Tierney
103 N.J. Eq. 336
| N.J. | 1928
|
Check Treatment

The bill of complaint in this case was filed for the construction of the second clause of the will of Patrick Tierney, deceased, in which the land and premises No. 53 New street, Newark, New Jersey, are involved. The will is dated February 16th, 1917.

Our examination of the record and the briefs of the respective solicitors satisfy us that the decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Berry should be affirmed. Upon the other questions disposed of by the learned vice-chancellor, concerning which, he stated that he was acting more as an arbitrator than as a judge, we express no opinion. Those matters are not appealable under the recent case of Harmina v. Shay, 101 N.J. Eq. 273.

The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 337

Case Details

Case Name: Tierney v. Tierney
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 15, 1928
Citation: 103 N.J. Eq. 336
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.