Tibble v. Edison Int'l, 135 S. Ct. 43

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to the following question: "Whether a claim that ERISA plan fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were available, is barred by 29 U.S.C. § 1113(1)when fiduciaries initially chose the higher-cost mutual funds as plan investments more than six years before the claim was filed."

Case Details

Case Name: Tibble v. Edison Int'l

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: Oct 2, 2014

Citations: 135 S. Ct. 43; 189 L. Ed. 2d 895; 83 U.S.L.W. 3183; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4901; No. 13–550.

Docket Number: No. 13–550.

Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS