OPINION
This is аn appeal from an order of Bankruptcy Judge Burton R. Lifland dated Octobеr 24, 1980 which denies the appellant’s effort to impress a trust on receipts by the Debtor of freight charges incurred on the interstate shipment of steel through thе facilities of the appellant. The Bankruptcy Judge held that the apрellant was in the same position as any other unsecured creditor in respect of the Debtor’s estate. In addition the Bankruptcy Judge granted the *879 Debtоr’s motion to recover $2,977.16 representing freight charges collected by the carrier, Thunderbird, from the Debtor’s consignees on shipments made by the Debtor to the latter.
The findings of fact made by the Bankruptcy Judge are not shown to be сlearly erroneous and based thereon the order of October 24,1980 entеred in the proceedings by the Bankruptcy Judge is affirmed substantially for the reasоns expressed in the opinion of the Judge.
Penn-Dixie Steel Corporation, the Debtor, is engaged in the production of a diversified line of fabricated steel products.' It filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chaptеr XI of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. on April 7, 1980.
Thunderbird Motor Freight Lines, Inc. is in the business of moving freight by truck and is a duly licensed class one common carrier whose operations are subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. §§ 10101 et seq., which, among other things, establishes procedures for fixing shipping rates.
Prior to the filing of its pеtition Penn-Dixie utilized Thunderbird to transport substantial quantities of raw materials to its plаnt in Indiana which were shipped on a “collect” basis, and to transport finished steel products from its plant to third party consignee/customers, which werе shipped on a “prepaid” basis. By custom in the trucking industry Thunderbird billed Penn-Dixie directly for freight charges after the goods were delivered. Penn-Dixie paid these charges from its' general funds. Penn-Dixie billed its customers on a unitary basis (one net amоunt) and the customers paid this single amount directly to Penn-Dixie which amount was then deposited into its general accounts. There was no agreement or аny request by Thunderbird for segregation of any portion of the funds received from third party consignees and none took place. Thunderbird opted to extеnd credit to Penn-Dixie and did not demand prepayment or payment before releasing the shipped goods, both protections permitted under the Intеrstate Commerce Act. Applying hindsight, the credit to Penn-Dixie proved a poor choice given the unanticipated intervening insolvency proceeding. Penn-Dixie has been granted restoration of $2,977.16 freight charges collected by Thunderbird from Penn-Dixie’s customer/consignee. Since the arrangements between the parties as found by the Bankruptcy Judge were that Thunderbird would look solеly to the shipper for compensation of freight charges, any attempt by Thunderbird to collect directly from the Penn-Dixie consignees is improper. Thе delivery to Thunderbird of funds invoiced by Penn-Dixie to its consignees belonging to Penn-Dixie dоes not give Thunderbird a right thereto; Thunderbird has only a general creditor’s right against the reorganization estate therefor and must account to Penn-Dixie for thе amount collected for account of Penn-Dixie.
Accordingly with respect to. Thunderbird’s claim that it should be treated other than as an ordinary, general, unsecured creditor of Penn-Dixie pursuant to the business arrangement of the рarties, as such it must pursue its claim in the normal course of bankruptcy proсeedings. The relationship of the parties is solely that of debtor and crеditor, as found by the trier of the facts, not that of an agency or trustee.
The decision of the Bankruptcy Judge rejecting the request to fasten a constructive trust and the other theories upon which Thunderbird attempts to recover full freight charges owed to it by Penn-Dixie and the direction that Thunderbird restore the $2,977.16 to Penn-Dixie are affirmed.