History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thrasher v. Thrasher
295 Ala. 426
Ala.
1976
Check Treatment

The parties to this cause, through their respective counsel, have filed a joint motion to remand, which motion is due to be, and hereby is, granted.

This case represents a noteworthy "First" in this Court. Rule 33, ARAP, provides, under limited circumstances, for a prehearing conference in the appellate courts of this State. A careful study of the excellent briefs filed by counsel indicated a common understanding of the Homestead Statutes — the single issue presented — and their application to the facts of the case at bar. The forthrightness of counsel for each of the adverse parties caused this Court on its own motion to schedule and hold a prehearing conference. Subsequently, the parties submitted a settlement agreement in writing followed by a joint motion to remand the cause to the trial Court for the entering of a substitute final decree effecting the settlement agreement of the parties.

Motion granted and cause remanded.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, MADDOX, and SHORES, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Thrasher v. Thrasher
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Feb 20, 1976
Citation: 295 Ala. 426
Docket Number: SC 1299
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.