History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thornley v. Flemming
04-6604
4th Cir.
May 20, 2004
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry E. Thornley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Perry E. Thornley, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. [*] We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Thornley v. Flemming, No. CA-03-419-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -

Case Details

Case Name: Thornley v. Flemming
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 20, 2004
Docket Number: 04-6604
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.