History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thorne v. Yontz
4 Cal. 321
Cal.
1854
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.

The consideration of the note was clearly against public policy, but it was made to take the form of commercial paper, and having been transferred to an innocent holder before its maturity, in his hands it is purged of the objection, and must be enforced. It is similar to the case of Haight v. Joyce, 2 Cal. 64.

Judgment affirmed.

Cited, 1 Woods, 448.

Case Details

Case Name: Thorne v. Yontz
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1854
Citation: 4 Cal. 321
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.