Thorne v. Casale

Mar 16, 1925
Versions:128 A. 174
101 N.J.L. 418
1925 N.J. LEXIS 260
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Kalisch, Van Buskirk, JJ. 2.