Thorne v. Casale

Mar 16, 1925
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Kalisch, Van Buskirk, JJ. 2.