Thе appeal before us arose out of the following facts and circumstances: Mac Thornburgh, plaintiff in error here, and another filed an action in the district court of Okmulgee county against Ben Hur Coal Company, a corporation, to cancel a coal mining lease covering certain lands in that county. The lease was dated April 30, 1929, and was for a primary term of 15 years and as much longer as coal was mined. On March 26, 1947, the court entered a judgment, the pertinent portion of which is as follows:
“It is therefore considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that unless within ninety (90) days from final judgment herein the Ben Hur Coal Company, its successors or assigns, are actually producing coal upon said lease premises that the coal lease described in plaintiff’s Amended Petition be can-celled, and in such event all rights thereunder оf the Ben Hur Coal Company shall cease and terminate, except the right to remove its property as provided in said lease.”
Both parties filed motions for new trial, which were overruled. Ben Hur Coal Company gave notice of аppeal, and perfected its appeal to this court, as Supreme Court case No. 33370. On November 26, 1947, Ben Hur Coаl Company filed in this court its motion to dismiss its appeal, attaching thereto an affidavit to the effect that during the month of October, 1947, it produced coal from the leased premises, was continuing to produce coal therefrom, and that, having complied with the 90-day provision of the above decree dated March 26, 1947, the questions involved in the appeal had become moot.
*554 On December 1, 1947, the defendants in error in that case filed a motion to dismiss the appeаl on the ground that the judgment of March 26, 1947, was not final and therefore not appealable. They also raised the objеction that the defendants in error in this case had made no objections and preserved no exceptions to thе decree of March 26, 1947, and had presumably waived any objections they had to that judgment.
On December 16, 1947, this court enterеd an order in case No. 33370 granting the motion of Ben Hur Coal Company to dismiss its appeal and striking the motion of the Thornburghs to dismiss thе appeal.
The Thornburghs, after the mandate of this court had reached the clerk of the district court of Okmulgee сounty, secured the issuance of an execution directing the sheriff to dispossess the Ben Hur Coal Company from the leаsed premises. Ben Hur Coal Company filed a motion to recall the execution. The trial court recalled the execution upon the ground that the judgment of March 26, 1947, did not become final until December 16, 1947, when Ben Hur Coal Company’s motion to dismiss the appeal was sustained, and the 90-day period had not expired, and the execution was therefore prеmaturely issued. Mac Thornburgh alone has appealed from this order, and this brings us to the case now under consideration. Mаc Thornburgh has presented the following propositions:
“1. The interlocutory judgment rendered on March 26, 1947, became final 90 days from the date thereof, and the coal lease was entitled by law to-be decreed cancelled as of Junе 25, 1947.
“2. When the appeal of the defendant in error was dismissed by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, the effect was the same as if no appeal had ever been taken from the interlocutory judgment of March 26, 1947.
“3. The judgment of the court, from which this appeal is taken, is not supported by sufficient evidence.”
When we look at the judgment rendered on March 26, 1947, we seе at once that it is not a final judgment because it says that the defendants have 90 days after final judgment to produce cоal from premises in question, and that if this is done their mineral lease will not be canceled. At best this type of judgment is ambiguous. Under our statutes and decisions the judgment was not final. Section 952, Title 12, O. S. 1941, provides that this court may reverse, vacate, or modify judgments of the district, superior, or county courts, and also a “final order” of such courts.
Section 953, Title 12, O. S. 1941, defines a “final order” in pаrt as an order affecting a substantial right in an action when such order, in effect, determines the action and prevents а judgment. A “judgment” is defined in section 681, Title 12, O. S. 1941, as follows:
“A judgment is a final determination of the rights of the parties in an action.”
In Carroll v. State ex rel. Mosier,
“A final judgment is onе ending a particular action in which it is entered, leaving nothing further for the court pronouncing it to do in order to determinе the rights of the parties.”
In Consumers’ Oil & Refining Co. v. Bilby,
As we view this case, no final judgment was entered prior to appeal. When the appeal was dismissed on the motion of the defendant, the case was back in thе trial court as if no appeal had
*555
ever been taken. Matyski v. Buczkowski,
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.