History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thompson v. Young
2 Ohio 334
Ohio
1826
Check Treatment
By the Court:

The authorities adduced by the defendants are conclusive that the securities were not bound for any defalcation that took place after the expiration of the first charter. And we hold them to be in accordance with the soundest principles of justice.

It is equally clear that the defendants can not be concluded by an adjudication in a case where they were not parties. The bill must be dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Thompson v. Young
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 15, 1826
Citation: 2 Ohio 334
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.