Thompson v. YoungThompson v. Young
- Reporters:
- ,
ON a rule to shew cause why an Exoneretur should not be entered on the Bail-piece, it appeared, that the Defendant was a resident of Maryland (though he came occasionally to Philadelphia upon business) and was duly discharged under the insolvent law of that State. Upon the authority of Millar versus Hall, ant. 229. the rule was made absolute.