History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thompson v. State
123 S.W. 593
Tex. Crim. App.
1909
Check Treatment

This appeal is prosecuted from a conviction had in the County Court of Taylor County wherein appellant was found guilty of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of the local option law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25 and twenty days confinement in the county jail.

The State introduced the witness Jim Searcy to whom the sale was alleged to have been made, who, in terms, denied having ever at any time or place bought any liquor from the appellant. The State laid a predicate to contradict him by showing his contradictory statements, amounting, in substance, to an admission of the sale in what is called a court of inquiry in the Corporation Court of the city of Abilene. This impeaching testimony could not be made the basis of a conviction. In this connection we desire to say further that the action of the court in the matter of conducting the examination in this case, we could not sanction and if there were no other matters raised on the appeal we would feel compelled to reverse the judgment. *Page 410

For the reason that the conviction was wholly without evidence to support it, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Thompson v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 8, 1909
Citation: 123 S.W. 593
Docket Number: No. 259.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.