150 So. 178 | Ala. | 1933
This case was reversed by the Court of Appeals upon the sole ground that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the defendants' special pleas 5 and 6 of recoupment and set-off. We fully agree with counsel for petitioner that the defense set up in these pleas was provable under the statutory suggestion that the indebtedness due upon the mortgage or conditional sale be ascertained (Torbert v. McFarland,
This court, however, will not reverse the Court of Appeals upon the doctrine of error without injury when the opinion of the Court of Appeals makes no reference to the question nor furnishes a statement of fact which could supply a basis for a review by this court.
Writ denied.
GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.