History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thompson v. Croff
182 Minn. 433
Minn.
1931
Check Treatment

1 Reported in 234 N.W. 688. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The action is for the specific performance of an alleged contract for deed. Plaintiff attacks a finding of the trial court to the effect that the alleged contract was incomplete and therefore unenforceable. This and numerous other assignments of error are not here considered since they avail plaintiff nothing because of either of two other findings of the trial court which are sustained by the evidence. One of these findings is that the plaintiff procured the contract by fraud; the other is that plaintiff is insolvent and is financially unable to perform the contract on his own part.

Affirmed. *Page 434

Case Details

Case Name: Thompson v. Croff
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jan 30, 1931
Citation: 182 Minn. 433
Docket Number: No. 28,264.
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.