101 P. 201 | Or. | 1909
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an action of replevin to recover certain brick. • The complaint is in the usual form, alleging special
Plaintiff urges the insufficiency of the answer for two reasons: (1) That defendant’s right to control the sale of the brick is that of an agency, in which the agent has no interest, and therefore revocable by Thompson at pleasure; (2) that the agreement does not surrender Thompson’s possession or control of the property.
We find no error in the ruling of the court, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.