| Iowa | Apr 7, 1863
The.foreclosure of a mortgage in which'the mortgagor and his vendees are made parties defendants, the latter having assumed in their deed of purchase to pay the debt of the mortgagor, a personal judgment was rendered against them as well as a special decree of foreclosure against the property. The vendees appeal, insisting that it was not competent for the Court to render such a judgment against them. This precise question, after full argument and careful consideration, we decided against the defendants in the case of Corbett v. Waterman, 11 Iowa, 87; affirming the same principle a second time in the case of
“ A mortgagee may maintain a personal action against a ^ grantee of the mortgaged premises who has assumed to J pay the incumbrance. He may pursue this remedy without f foreclosing the mortgage, and without joining the rnbrt- | gagor as defendant.” Burr v. Beers, 24 N.Y., 178" court="NY" date_filed="1861-12-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/burr-v--beers-3600335?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3600335">24 N. Y., 178. This is ! only a confirmation of a rule which we think too well set ;l tied to be disturbed at present. '
Affirmed.