67 Iowa 79 | Iowa | 1885
The circuit court was in session from December 1 until December 11, 1881, except during the intervening Sunday. The injunction was granted by the judge of said court on the fourth day of December, and such allowance indorsed on the petition. The injunction was after-wards issued by the clerk.
Counsel for the defendants contend that a judge has no power to grant an injunction during the time the court is in session, and therefore the motion to dissolve should have been sustained. The record fails to show that the allowance was made while the court was actually in session. We must therefore assume, as error cannot be presumed, that the order was made by the judge at the time when the court was not in fact in session. That it was constructively in session will be conceded.
The statute provides that a temporary injunction may be granted by a court or judge thereof in which the action is pending. If thaorder is made by the court, the clerk shall make an entry thereof in the court record, and issue the order accordingly. If made in vacation, the judge must indorse the order on the petition. Code, § § 3389-3391. As the rights of the defendants are precisely the same whether the allowance is made by the court or judge, it is difficult to see how they were in any respect prejudiced, if the allowance was made during the term time, or while the court was actually in session. But if the order cannot be made by the judge during the session of the court for want of power, it is possible that prejudice should be presumed, as counsel contend, and that there are but two periods of time. One
Affirmed.
