211 F. 120 | 2d Cir. | 1914
(after stating the facts as above). The facts will be found set forth with sufficient fullness in Judge Chat-field’s opinion; they need not be repeated here at length.
Thompson’s testimony as to the making of the contract is to some extent corroborated by other witnesses to whom Shipman, long before any controversy arose, made explanations as to how it happened that he had Thompson’s models and papers on his own desk.
It seems to us that a business man of reasonable care and prudence would, under these circumstances, before putting his money into an enterprise, have gone to Thompson and asked him if he- was making any claim to this invention of Shipman and, if he said he was, would have asked him what was the nature of his claim, so that the inquirer might advise himself whether he could safely purchase.
We concur with Judge Chatfield, who has fully discussed the facts. The decree is affirmed, with costs.