History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc.
102 S.E. 374
Ga. Ct. App.
1920
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

1. Under all the facts of the case the court did not err in excluding the documentary evidence offered by the plaintiff.

2. The evidence adduced by the plaintiff failed to prove as against any *28of the defendants any act of negligence as alleged in the petition as amended. The court therefore properly awarded a nonsuit.

Decided March 3, 1920. Action fox damages; from city court of Atlanta—■ Judge Reid. October 21, 1919. Mark Bolding, J. Caleb Clarke, for plaintiff. Candler, Thomson & Hirsch, Roy Lewis, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 3, 1920
Citation: 102 S.E. 374
Docket Number: 11121
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.