Thomasson v. State

Nov 26, 1926
4 Div. 310.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Anderson
PER CURIAM.

As far as we have been able ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍to review tbe opinion of tbe Court of Appeals, we bave found no error. We bave ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍been unable to review most of tbe questions raised by tbis application, for tbe reason ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍that sucb review would involve inquiries of fact, sucb as tbis court bas heretofore in ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍numerous cases refused to indulge. Postal Telegraph, etc., v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.