History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. State
659 So. 2d 404
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1995
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand appellant’s sentence for rescoring with a correct guidelines sheet because (1) he should not have been assessed 6 points for the violation of a single release program order, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702(d)(10), and (2) for correction of the written findings to support the habitual offender sentence, which the state concedes are erroneous. Although we recognize that these errors will not necessarily result in a different sentence, we are not willing to assume that a change in appellant’s score will not affect the court’s discretion in imposing his sentence. Cochran v. State, 592 So.2d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

DELL and KLEIN, JJ., and RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 2, 1995
Citation: 659 So. 2d 404
Docket Number: No. 94-2757
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.