History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. State
659 So. 2d 14
Ala. Crim. App.
1994
Check Treatment

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

On September 2, 1994, the Alabama Supreme Court reversed our judgment and remanded this case to this court with the instruction that we remand the case to the trial court for that court to order a hearing on whether the prosecutor used his peremptory strikes in a discriminatory fashion to remove blacks from the venire in violation of Batson v. Kentucky,476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Ex parte Thomas,659 So.2d 3 (Ala. 1994). We so order.

The trial court shall take the necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this court at the earliest possible time and within 56 days of the release of this opinion. The return to remand shall include a transcript of the remand proceedings conducted by the trial court. Upon due return, Thomas shall have 21 days in which to file a supplemental brief with this court. The state shall have 14 days from the filing of Thomas's brief or from the expiration of the time herein provided for the filing of Thomas's brief, whichever occurs first, to file a supplemental brief in this case.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur. *Page 15

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 10, 1994
Citation: 659 So. 2d 14
Docket Number: CR-92-0320
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.