History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. State
89 Ga. 479
Ga.
1892
Check Treatment

*480 Judgment affirmed.

3. Other witnesses could have been obtained, as he is informed and believes since the trial, whose names he does not now know and whom he is advised and believes he can have present in the event a new trial is granted. No affidavits appear to have accompanied the motion. The bill of exceptions states that the counsel for the defendant announced ready. Pre.ston & Giles, for plaintiff in error. W. A. Little, attorney-general, and H. G. Lewis, solicitor-general, by Hines, Shubricic & Felder, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 4, 1892
Citation: 89 Ga. 479
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.