Thomas v. State, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 162

Thomas v. State

2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 162

| Mo. Ct. App. | 2006

Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Torobereja Thomas (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.151 following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.