History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. Johnson
208 Ala. 701
| Ala. | 1922
|
Check Treatment

The testimony was sufficient, if believed by the trial court, to sustain the judgment for plaintiff. Newly discovered evidence will not warrant the granting of a new trial, in the absence of any explanation by appellant of his failure to produce it on the trial, or of any showing whatever of diligence in the premises. W. Va. Land Co. v. May, 166 Ala. 127,52 So. 315; McLeod v. Shelly, etc., Co., 108 Ala. 81,19 So. 326.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. Johnson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 2, 1922
Citation: 208 Ala. 701
Docket Number: 4 Div. 7.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.