History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. Dreyspring
167 So. 262
| Ala. | 1936
|
Check Treatment

Bill to quiet title. The sole question in this case involves the delivery of the trust deed exhibited to the bill of complaint. It is, of course, well settled that if a deed was never delivered to the grantee, it will not operate as a conveyance. Loring v. Grummon, 176 Ala. 236, 57 So. 818; Gulf Red Cedar Co. v. Crenshaw, 169 Ala. 606, 607, 53 So. 812.

The true test of delivery is whether or not the grantor intended to reserve to himself the locus poenitentiæ. Griswold v. Griswold, 148 Ala. 239, 241, 42 So. 554, *Page 100 121 Am.St.Rep. 64; Powell v. Powell, 217 Ala. 287, 116 So. 139.

The only evidence in this case negatives a delivery actual or constructive of the trust deed in question, and the decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. Dreyspring
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Apr 9, 1936
Citation: 167 So. 262
Docket Number: 3 Div. 171.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.