114 So. 736 | Miss. | 1927
The only question argued is whether or not the court erred in giving the following instruction:
"The court instructs the jury for the defendant, George Carter, that if you believe from a preponderance of the testimony in the case that the slapping or striking of the plaintiff by the defendant, George Carter, was provoked by the plaintiff calling George Carter `a damn son of a bitch,' then the jury has the right to determine whether the calling of George D. Carter `a damn son of a bitch' was a sufficient excuse or justification for the striking or slapping of the plaintiff by George Carter, and if the jury, from the preponderance of the testimony, believe that the calling of George Carter `a damn son of a bitch' by plaintiff was a sufficient excuse or justification for striking or slapping plaintiff, then their verdict will be, `We, the jury, find for the defendant.'"
The action of the court in giving this instruction was authorized by the decision of this court in Choate v. Pierce,
Appellant's main reliance for reversal is Coleman v. Y. M.V.R. Co.,
Affirmed.