History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. Black
118 Ohio St. 412
Ohio
1928
Check Treatment

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The machine of Thomas, the defendant below, was being driven by Mabel Brown, his stepdaughter, while the owner was not in the car. At the trial a verdict for the defendant was directed on the ground that it was not shown that Mabel Brown was the agent of the owner. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the cause to the court of common pleas, for the reason that "said court erred in directing a verdict at close of plaintiff's testimony on the ground that plaintiff's evidence did not show a scintilla of evidence establishing agency." On consideration of the entire record, this court is of the opinion that the question of agency was one of fact to be determined by inferences to be drawn from the evidence adduced, and that a reversal of the Court of Appeals would involve a determination of the weight and probative force of such inferences. This court not being required to weigh the evidence, the judgment of the Court of Appeals must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE, ROBINSON and JONES, JJ., concur. *Page 414

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. Black
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 18, 1928
Citation: 118 Ohio St. 412
Docket Number: 20820
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.