History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas Leath v. United States
671 F. App'x 194
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Delawrence Leath, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Thomas Delawrence Leath appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing for failure to state a claim, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Leath’s Bivens [*] complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Leath v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-00248- CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. May 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas Leath v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 19, 2016
Citation: 671 F. App'x 194
Docket Number: 16-6672
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.