History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Lerman
107 F. Supp. 835
D.D.C.
1951
Check Treatment
McGUIRE, District Judge.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Counterclaim dismissed.

.Defendants have established no common law mark, since that used by them has acquired no secondary meaning and is purely descriptive. I doubt further that it could acquire a secondary meaning in the sense that term has been defined by the Supreme Court. Apart from that, the defendants have failed it would seem to actively merchandise the product for at least the last three years.

Counsel will prepare proper order.

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Lerman
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Jul 14, 1951
Citation: 107 F. Supp. 835
Docket Number: Civ. A. 4378-49
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.