Case Information
*1 Case 2:23-cv-01832-RSM Document 10 Filed 02/05/24 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
MICHAEL THEIN Case No. 2:23-cv-01832-RSM Plaintiffs, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.
OAK HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT Defendants.
Pro se
Plaintiff Michael Thein filed this case against Oak Harbor Police Department on November 30, 2023. Dkt. #4. Mr. Thein was ordered to amend his complaint within thirty days on December 18, 2023, which he filed on December 29, 2023. Dkts. #6, #8. Mr. Thein was ordered to show cause on January 3, 2024, with instructions to file no later than thirty days from the date of the Order, by February 2, 2024, or this case would be dismissed. Dkt. #9. Mr. Thein did not file a response by February 2, 2024.
Mr. Thein alleges the following causes of action against the Oak Harbor Police Department under several citations, including § 1983, the Fourth Amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Washington Administrative Code, and “Act of 1986 ECPA.” Id . at 1, 5. He lists several locations, such as “Zoo NW . . . by Ave trl . . . 9 Oak Harbor, WA . . . Skagit Valley ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1
*2 Case 2:23-cv-01832-RSM Document 10 Filed 02/05/24 Page 2 of 2 Hospital Mount Vernon WA . . . [and] Swinomish Casino Lodge[,]” but notes the events giving rise to this claim occurred in Oak Harbor, Washington. Id . at 6. He names several people, including “Dad” and “Mom,” as being in car accidents, and he claims emotional and physical injuries concerning numerous people. Id . at 7. Mr. Thein further claims “immaterial” and “irreparable” damages, as well as actual, economic, and breach of contract damages. Id . at 7. He vaguely sates that these events occurred between “March 2007 – Present[.]” Id . at 6.
The Court will dismiss a Complaint at any time if the action fails to state a claim, raises frivolous or malicious claims, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
As the Court’s previous Order explained, Mr. Thein’s Amended Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted due to insufficient detail and deficiencies requiring dismissal. Dkt. #9; see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Mr. Thein was ordered to file a short statement telling the Court why this case should not be dismissed as frivolous by February 2, 2024, or this case would be dismissed. Mr. Thein did not file a response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All pending motions are STRICKEN as moot, and the Clerk shall close this case.
DATED this 5 th day of February, 2024.
A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 2