20 F. 926 | D.N.J. | 1884
This is a libel in rem by the owner, master, and crew of the steam-tug Henry L. Waite to recover salvage for services rendered to the ship Young America under the following circumstances: At about a quarter before 2 o’clock on the afternoon of February 8, 1884, an oil tank exploded and a fire broke out in the yard of the Standard Oil Company, at Hunter’s point, on the East river. The place of the explosion which caused the fire was upwards of 200 feet back from the river front, and about 50 feet south of the canal or creek which is the northern boundary of the yard, and that separates it from the Daylight or Empire oil-yard. This canal is about 125 feet in'width. The Daylight oil-yard, borders upon it on the south, and upon the East river on the west. When the fire began, the claimants’ vessel, Young America, was lying on the river bulk-head of said yards, outside of the bark William K. Chapman, about 200 feet north of the creek, and fastened to the shore by lines. These lines were shortly afterwards cut, — by whom i' does not appear, — and both vessels began to drift slowly towards the -middle of th- stream and down the river. It was about low water, and there is ^oof that there was a slight eddy, which carried them towards the mouth of the creek, and an east wind that blew them a short distance from the shore. She had a signal displayed on the port side, in her rigging, asking for a tow. The libelants’ boat was docking a vessel at the foot of Fourteenth street, on the New York side of the river, when the explosion and the consequent smoke and fire in the Standard oil-yard attracted their attention. They hastened over to the other side in order to be in a position to render aid to vessels requiring help, and, being attracted by the signal on the Young America, they went alongside, fastened to her, and towed her up the river opposite to Black-* well’s island, and left her there at anchor. The spars of the William K. Chapman were so entangled in the rigging of the Young America
Was the work performed by the Henry L. Waite and her crew, under such circumstances, a salvage or a towage service? It was certainly something more than the latter, although, as affairs turned out, perhaps a low grade of the former. It is often difficult to get a fair estimate of the value of a service by viewing it in the light of subsequent events. It ought to be looked at in connection with the facts which seem to surround it at the time. We can look back now and easily come to the conclusion that the Young America was, at no juncture of the affair, in any real danger. We can see that, after she got beyond the inliuence of the eddy, the young flood-tide and the easterly wind would co-operate, if she were left alone, to remove her from the impending peril. But then there was groat excitement. The oil tanks were exploding, the oil taking fire and running into the creek ablaze, and the flames were extending a hundred feet in the air. The surface of the creek was not covered, nor more than half covered, with the burning oil, and yet, to the excited imagination of a number of the witnesses, the flame extended from shore to shore, and threatened to creep over into the Daylight yard, and to come in contact with other inflammable materials. They never went quite to the mouth of the creek, — certainly not beyond the mouth, — and yet some spectators believed that the water was ablaze nearly a hundred feet into the river. Such was the condition of affairs when the Waite appeared upon the scene. She came, not merely as an angel of mercy, to relieve distress and avert threatened disaster, but with an eye to business and profit as well.
The captain of the steam-tug says that he saw the signal of distress in the rigging of the Young America; that he drew along-side and asked for the captain, and was told that he was forward. He then remarked to a man, whom he afterwards understood was the mate, “You tell the captain that I will take him out for $1,000;” and the reply came back, “Give him a line.” The line was given and made fast, and the ship towed to the other side of the river.
The master of the Waite claims that a contract was entered into that he should receive $1,000 for the service of taking charge of the ship and removing her to a place of safety, and asks the court to so decree. The master of the Young America, on the other hand, de
I have read all tbe testimony with care, and'have come to' tbe conclusion that $300 is a liberal allowance for the service rendered. A decree will therefore be entered for the libelants for that sum, with costs; one-half to be awarded to tbe owner of the tug-boat, $25 to the master, and the remaining $125 to be divided among the crew, including tbe master, in proportion to the rate of the wages, respectively, paid to them. If such division cannot be made by tbe proctors, a reference will be ordered. I should have made a larger allowance to the master of tbe Waite if I was not strongly impressed with tbe thought that, in his demand of $1,000 for such a service, he was attempting to profit by tbe fright and necessities of tbe claimants.