29 F. Cas. 946 | D. Mass. | 1855
held that the vessel was in a condition to be the subject of salvage service. The men who labored under Holbrook, in attempting to launch the vessel, were not salvors, inasmuch as the services by them rendered had no tendency to relieve her from peril, and did not at all contribute to her ultimate safety; that the men who succeeded in relieving her were entitled to salvage compensation, unless the nature of the contract, under which they labored upon her. displaced their claim: that an agreement to relieve a vessel in peril, for an agreed compensation, is binding upon the salv-
Subsequently, the counsel for the libellants moved for leave to amend, by making Hoi-brook a party, stating that he was authorized to act for Holbrook. Leave being granted, a decree was rendered in favor of Holbrook and Otis, for the $900, without costs, and the libel dismissed, as to all the rest of the libel-lants.