History
  • No items yet
midpage
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori
1:22-cv-07925
| E.D.N.Y | Oct 31, 2023
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------x

THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs, Case No. 22-CV-7925-FB-RER -against-

KINGS COUNTY PUBLIC

ADMINISTRATOR, as Administrator of

the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased;

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF

TAXATION AND FINANCE; NEW

YORK CITY ENVIRONMENTAL

CONTROL BOARD; DEPARTMENT OF

SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE CITY OF

NEW YORK; CAMELLA L. JOHNSON;

“JOHN DOE #1-5” and “JANE DOE #1-

5”, said names being fictitious,

it being the intention of plaintiff to

designate any and all occupants, tenants,

persons or corporations, if any, having

or claiming an interest in or lien upon the

premises being foreclosed herein,

Defendants.

------------------------------------------------x

BLOCK, Senior District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Reyes has issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that a default judgment of foreclosure and sale be entered in this case. *2 The R&R gave the parties 14 days to file objections and warned that “[f]ailure to file timely objections waives the right to appeal the District Court’s Order.” R&R at 10. It was served by mail on September 22, 2023, making objections due on October 9, 2023. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). No objections have been filed.

Where clear notice has been given of the consequences of failure to object, and there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo review. See Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); Mario v. P & C Food Mkts., Inc. , 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002) (“Where parties receive clear notice of the consequences, failure timely to object to a magistrate’s report and recommendation operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate’s decision.”). The Court will, however, excuse the failure to object and conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed plain error. See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility , 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000).

No error, plain or otherwise, appears on the face of the R&R, so the Court adopts it without de novo review. Accordingly, the Clerk shall enter judgment (1) ordering the foreclosure and sale of 1578 East 34th Street, Brooklyn, New York 11234, (2) appointing Frank Pellegrini to conduct the sale, (3) directing that Pellegrini receive a fee of $750 from the proceeds of the sale, (4) directing that the plaintiff receive $917,033.01, plus costs of $1,133.36 and post-judgment interest, from the proceeds of *3 the sale, and (5) dismissing defendants “John Doe #1-5” and “Jane Doe #1-5.”

SO ORDERED.

_/S/ Frederic Block___________ FREDERIC BLOCK Senior United States District Judge Brooklyn, New York

October 31, 2023

Case Details

Case Name: The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori
Court Name: District Court, E.D. New York
Date Published: Oct 31, 2023
Docket Number: 1:22-cv-07925
Court Abbreviation: E.D.N.Y
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.