History
  • No items yet
midpage
The Rival
1 Sprague 128
D. Mass.
1846
Check Treatment
SPRAGUE, District Judge.

Upon the facts of this case, and the answers of the experts, it appears that both vessels were to blame. In such case, it is the settled doctrine of the admiralty, that the whole damage should be equally divided between the two vessels. I think that the Rival was most in fault, and that she ought therefore to bear all the costs. The Woodrop-Sims. 2 Dod. 83; De Vaux v. Salvador, 4 Adol. & E. 420; Shee, Abb. Shipp, tit. “Collision”; 17 Law Mag. 327: The Monarch, 2 Month. Law Mag. 607; The De Cock, 5 Month. Law. Mag. 303; Reeves v. The Constitution [Case No. 11,659]; Story, Bailm. $ 608a; 3 Kent, Comm. 231.

Decree accordingly.

Case Details

Case Name: The Rival
Court Name: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Date Published: Mar 15, 1846
Citation: 1 Sprague 128
Court Abbreviation: D. Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.