| SCOTUS | Dec 18, 1871

79 U.S. 451" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1871-12-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/the-patapsco-88416?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="88416">79 U.S. 451 (____) 12 Wall. 451" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1871-12-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/the-patapsco-88416?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="88416">12 Wall. 451

THE PATAPSCO.

Supreme Court of United States.

*452 On this state of facts, Mr. Orville Horwitz, for the appellee.^[*]

Mr. Donohue, contra.

The CHIEF JUSTICE:

The decree of the Circuit Court was for the amount reported due the libellant on the 15th July, 1868, $1982, and interest from the date of the report. We think that interest to the date of the decree must be computed as a part of the sum for which the decree was rendered. The sum thus computed exceeds $2000, and the motion must, therefore, be

DENIED.

NOTES

[*] Citing Udall v. Ohio, 17 Howard, 17, and Olney v. Falcon, Ib. 19.