History
  • No items yet
midpage
The McDonald
4 Blatchf. 477
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1860
Check Treatment
NELSON, Circuit Justice.

It was erroneous in the court below to allow costs on the dismissal of the libel for want of jurisdiction. In such a case, by the settled practice of the supreme court, no costs are allowed. So much of the decree below as awarded costs to the claimant must, therefore, be reversed. As the libellant had a right to come to this court to reverse that part of the decree, below which awarded costs against him, I shall not allow costs against him on the appeal, although a part of the decree appealed from is affirmed; and, because he cláimed to reverse the whole decree, I shall not allow any costs to him on the appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: The McDonald
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Date Published: Nov 30, 1860
Citation: 4 Blatchf. 477
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.