History
  • No items yet
midpage
The Matter of County of Broome v. Nirav R. Shah
69 SSM 43
| NY | Feb 16, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 69 SSM 43

In the Matter of County of

Broome,

Respondent,

v.

Nirav R. Shah, &c., et al.,

Appellants.

Submitted by Victor Paladino, for appellants. Respondent, precluded.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, without costs, petition dismissed in its entirety, and a declaration made in favor of respondents Nirav R. Shah, &c., et al. that section 61 of part D of Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2012 has not been shown to be unconstitutional (see Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 28 NY3d 244 [2016]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judges Stein and Fahey took no part.

Decided February 16, 2017

Case Details

Case Name: The Matter of County of Broome v. Nirav R. Shah
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 16, 2017
Docket Number: 69 SSM 43
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.