History
  • No items yet
midpage
The Mamie
8 F. 367
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1881
Check Treatment
BaxteR, 0. J.

The decision of Judge Brown is correct. The Mar mie, the vessel mentioned in the pleadings, not only comes within the spirit of the statute, (section 4289 of the Revised Statutes,) excepting canal-boats, barges, and lighters from the preceding sections, limiting the liability of owners of vessels, but is a “barge” within the meaning of the statute.

There are other questions in the case worthy of consideration; but as a determination of them is not necessary to a decision of the case, and as my judgment would not settle them, but only add to the conflict of authorities already existing, I shall forbear to express ,any opinion touching the questions made.

The libel will be dismissed, and a decree to that effect will be entered during my next visit to Detroit in September.

Case Details

Case Name: The Mamie
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan
Date Published: Aug 13, 1881
Citation: 8 F. 367
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.