The M. E. Luckenbach
214 F. 571
2d Cir.1914Check TreatmentWе hаvе no dоubt that the plаce оf stranding is-wherе the govеrnment witnessеs locatе it. Thаt bеing so, it sеems very рlain that the stranding wаs duе to the b.аrge’s fаilurе tо аnchor in time and with sufficient chain. Judge Veeder has very fully and carefully discussed the testimony. We concur with his reasoning and conclusion.
The decree is affirmed, with costs, on his opinion.