History
  • No items yet
midpage
The M. E. Luckenbach
214 F. 571
2d Cir.
1914
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We have no doubt that the place of stranding is-where the government witnesses locate it. That being so, it seems very plain that the stranding was due to the b.arge’s failure to anchor in time and with sufficient chain. Judge Veeder has very fully and carefully discussed the testimony. We concur with his reasoning and conclusion.

The decree is affirmed, with costs, on his opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: The M. E. Luckenbach
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Apr 28, 1914
Citation: 214 F. 571
Docket Number: No. 250
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.