History
  • No items yet
midpage
The Commonwealth v. Chambre
1794 U.S. LEXIS 107
SCOTUS
1794
Check Treatment
4 U.S. 143 (____)
4 Dall. 143

The Commonwealth
versus
Chambrè.

Supreme Court of United States.

*144 Lewis, Ingersoll, and Franklin, for the negroes.

M. Levy, for Mrs. Chambrè.

But the COURT (stopping the counsel for Mrs. Chambrè) said, that they were, unanimously, of opinion, that the legislature intended calendar months; that the same expression, in other acts of the general assembly, has uniformly received the same construction; Brudenell et al. v. Vaux et al.[(1)] that there was nothing illegal, or improper, in the conduct of Mrs. Chambrè, on the occasion; and that, therefore, the negroes must be remanded into her service.

NOTES

[(1)] This case has been reported in 2 Dall. Rep. 302.

Case Details

Case Name: The Commonwealth v. Chambre
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Sep 1, 1794
Citation: 1794 U.S. LEXIS 107
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.