252 F. 583 | 2d Cir. | 1918
The fault alleged is that, instead of laying the Sea Beach smoothly or evenly alongside the Paulina, she was so disposed that her square corner ground into /the latter’s side as soon as, with the rising wind, the slip full of boats began to “churn.” On very conflicting, evidence the trial judge held that this plainly faulty arrangement existed, and wa:. the doing of the Britannia. We are not disposed to differ from such a finding of fact; therefore the tug was at fault.
This is carrying modesty too far; it was his duty to protect his own boat, and nothing prevented his performance of such duty. Certainly the crewless Sea Beach offered no impediment. This was a failure of duty, which is negligence.
Decree modified, so as to award half damages to libelant. Costs below divided; appellant to recover costs in this court.
<©5»For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes