History
  • No items yet
midpage
The Bertha F. Walker
220 F. 667
2d Cir.
1915
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

These causes present only two questions, both wholly of fact, on testimony sharply conflicting and manifestly irreconcilable. We have carefully examined the whole testimony, and do not find in it sufficient to justify a reversal of the findings, on these two questions, of the District Judge, who saw, heard, and himself questioned the witnesses. Discussion of the evidence seems superfluous; it would contribute nothing illuminative of admiralty law or practice.

The decrees are affirmed, with interest and costs.

Case Details

Case Name: The Bertha F. Walker
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Jan 12, 1915
Citation: 220 F. 667
Docket Number: Nos. 95-97
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.